Anti-intellectualism and Its Resultant Alienation

Daniel Lehewych, M.A
7 min readMar 22, 2022
Photo by Noah Silliman on Unsplash

Being a writer and a philosopher is not a choice one makes, for it is a commitment, and commitments make us, not the other way about. For, if the choice was as free and easy as the folk understanding of it suggests it is, few would choose to go down that path. This is because, while it is necessarily fulfilling work, it is only so for someone like myself, who, existentially, had no other choice. I could not do otherwise, for if I tried, I would be doubly miserable.

Nonetheless, this path is not glamorous in the slightest. One marches forward through spurious and arbitrary means, which one justifies perpetually by way of their ends — which are, themselves, indefinite. Ultimately, these ends are self-grounded, as one does it for no other reason than that one cannot see themselves doing anything differently.

Consider, however, what the incentives are and are not in contemporary American culture and how deviating from those incentives serves only to ostracize individuals and groups with profound vexation. To be a writer, philosopher, or just an overall educated human being is, in effect, to be an unproductive drag who is only understood by other unproductive drags — to whom no one has any interest in understanding. Using ‘big words’ generates reliable responses from folks, most of which being exclusively sardonic in intent, not — as…

--

--

Daniel Lehewych, M.A

Philosopher and Author Bylines: Big Think, Newsweek, PsychCentral